View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-10-2015, 01:51
KohKohPuffs KohKohPuffs is offline
Registered User
AKA: Daniel Koh
FRC #0299 (Valkyrie Robotics)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Saratoga, CA
Posts: 120
KohKohPuffs has a spectacular aura aboutKohKohPuffs has a spectacular aura aboutKohKohPuffs has a spectacular aura about
Re: pic: Inverted CIM 2-Speed Gearbox

Quote:
Originally Posted by asid61 View Post
Those speeds are much better, you should be able to withstand a pushing match for a least a little while (I'm getting about 50A current draw with 4.2" wheels, 150lbs, and 1.3 CoF).
Removing the idlers can only do you good, regardless of wearing out. Reduces complexity and weight. If you have to keep them, that makes sense, but I would remove them if at all possible.
What are you guys moving away from belts for? The epitome of flipped-cim gearboxes (192 in 2014) used belts for their first stage and it reportedly went swimmingly. Saves a lot of weight and space in these things IME.
I might be completely wrong about my team and belts, but we've been using belts for a while on our DT, and this offseason we're experimenting with chain DTs.

I mean... this only applies to the chassis, so perhaps I would attempt a belt system for the first stage. However, I'm using a large ratio for that stage, so I'm not even sure if there are the right pulleys for my configuration.

-Is there an online store that specializes in pulleys? It's been a while since I last been there, and my memory is fading away... -_-
-Also, is it possible to make your own pulleys? If so, is there a link to how to do that?
__________________
-KohKoh

115 MVRT, Driver (2013-2015)
649 M-SET, CAD (2015-2016)
299 Valkyrie Robotics, Mechanical Director (2016 - present)
Reply With Quote