View Single Post
  #182   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-10-2015, 11:34
jcatt's Avatar
jcatt jcatt is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jonathan Catt
FRC #1902 (Exploading Bacon and FRC #1251 TechTigers)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 44
jcatt is a glorious beacon of lightjcatt is a glorious beacon of lightjcatt is a glorious beacon of lightjcatt is a glorious beacon of lightjcatt is a glorious beacon of lightjcatt is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Official FIRST Stronghold Teaser!

Ok, So I don't usually post on these types of threads, (I don't think I have posted in general in over 2 years anyway) but I was talking with a fellow FIRST Alumni about the new game and something kinda struck me...

A few considerations first:
  • The blueprint from the teaser is representative of the playing field.
  • The suggestions of those previous that the driver stations are along the sides of the field instead of the ends.
  • Some large central scoring platform as indicated in the blueprint.
  • In the past few years it appears FIRST is trying to move teams into specializing more and limiting the ability for the "One Robot to Rule them All" teams.

So, you now have a field which is designed to limit the view of different positions of the driver station, where more defensive robots are placed on the side closes to the opponent alliance for a better view. While the more scoring oriented teams are in the middle and far positions. Trouble is this could cause chaos with the scheduling of the qualification rounds. (No defensive robots for the position, or all defensive robots, etc)

Now, it occurred to me that what if you implemented a class system for robots. You would have to pick your class at the start of the build season and the rules would be so different that it would be difficult to switch mid-season. You would also register at the event as that particular robot class and the scheduling system would be designed to accommodate one robot of each class per alliance. The class system would also be designed with tiered levels of robot complexity and/or game complexity, so only a particular class can achieve a specific game objective. If there are more robots in a particular class they get less matches so their average score counts much more that a lower populated class which gets a lot more matches. It also give the teams who pick the "easier" class, traditionally the smaller or less experienced teams a fairly good chance to play with the more advanced, powerhouse type teams who pick the top tier class.

Now the obligatory wildly unlikely supporting data from the teaser....

Rally your Kingdom - In recent Fantasy culture when Kingdoms when to "war" they would have different classes of combat: Calvary Knights, Archers, Footmen
Build Your Champion - In most RPG games where you pick your character (Champion) you are expected to select some specialization class.
Different colors of flags on the tents - Could indicate different classes of "soldier" as stated above

So there you have it. It was a fun little though experiment... Thinking completely outside the preconceptions of games gone past. Keeps the mind limber I suppose and in actual fact the more I think about it, the more it sounds awesome.

Anyway, enough from me spoiling the worthwhile conversation here. Have fun and I will see you all around game time!

P.S For all you scouting fanatics - Easier Scouting as you only have to look at the classes outside yourself and easier pick lists when you are confined to a specific set of robots for a particular role.
__________________
Jonathan Catt
Co-Owner and Systems Architect of ColorScene Inc.

Co-Sponsor of The RoboShow: Orlando
FRC 1251 Alumni
FRC 1902 Mentor
Reply With Quote