|
Re: Registration 2016
Mark, this may not be possible, but I would love to see if the data supports my "scorched earth" theory.
I love grants for rookie teams, I do. It's obvious growth into new schools is a KPI for the organization as a whole, but it's not like we haven't seen how rookie grants play out.
I have concerns that when rookie grants run out and the team fails, the school is essentially "scorched" and won't be amenable to picking the program back up again for a period of time. We saw this in New England with the Smith Family teams - only a handful still exist and we have to wait the school out for an administration change or something similar before they are open to jumping back in again.
All I'm asking is to just be careful. Yes, there are still a ton of high schools out there, but we're picking our best shot at sustainability in these grants and I would hate to see our growth stunted because of shortsightedness.
__________________
jessicaboucher.com
FRC Alum, Mentor, Volunteer, lots of things.
Championship Volunteer of the Year, 2016
Advisor, NE FIRST
|