View Single Post
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-11-2015, 10:32
DonShaw DonShaw is offline
Registered User
FRC #1261
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 38
DonShaw is a glorious beacon of lightDonShaw is a glorious beacon of lightDonShaw is a glorious beacon of lightDonShaw is a glorious beacon of lightDonShaw is a glorious beacon of lightDonShaw is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Pros/Cons for making our Robotics Team selective?

Why I fully understand the issue of some students not participating at 100% or even less look at the mission statement of First:

"Mission

Our mission is to inspire young people to be science and technology leaders, by engaging them in exciting mentor-based programs that build science, engineering and technology skills, that inspire innovation, and that foster well-rounded life capabilities including self-confidence, communication, and leadership."


If you notice there nothing about building robots mentioned, but only mentions building skills and that can be accomplished by just observing and being present.

We have many students who do not actively participate but at times come out of the blue with a great a concept, so why would you want to stifle that? I feel it may take some kids three years to come out of their shell before they get really active.

So I say limiting kids is not a good thing unless you just can not contain them in your facility space.

I agree with the earlier post they will self limit if it is not for them.

We are a varsity lettering program and the kids that do not actively contribute in some manner do not get letters. We monitor time and attendance and have many other requirements they must meet to earn the letter. This actually had to be approved by the school system and is subject to monitoring.

Yes, it can be frustrating seeing student not participating but you have to try to engage them and understand why they are not active.
Reply With Quote