View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-11-2015, 09:30
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is offline
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,601
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: Metric vs SAE hardware

Quote:
Originally Posted by akoscielski3 View Post
Though it is likely most of your students will be using metric when they get into the work place (even in the America).
Many, many American companies use SAE / Imperial units and parts. I wouldn't use the industry as a reason to make a decision one way or another - a well rounded engineer will have to learn both systems in either case.

----

In FRC, just because of all the COTS parts using SAE hardware and the overwhelming majority of teams using SAE hardware to build their robots, I see no reason to go Metric for hardware at all. For nuts and bolts, it's about the same price, and you will need some SAE hardware on your robot anyway, so if you go metric for the rest of your hardware all you end up doing is creating unnecessary confusion and chances for error.

Save yourself a bunch of time and standardize on 10-32. You'll need the occasional 8-32, 1/4-20, or 4-40 bolt, but you can almost exclusively use 10-32 hardware and really streamline things. Makes it easier to find bolts and tools, replacements, etc. without having to size anything.

----

For bearings, Metric bearings are much cheaper and more available, but FRC standardizes on SAE for bearings as well, so it's probably just easier to go with that. Especially considering a lot of FRC bearings are proprietary (hex / ThunderHex)
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)