View Single Post
  #83   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-11-2015, 12:40
Michael Blake's Avatar
Michael Blake Michael Blake is online now
Head Coach - FRC Under Development
FRC #6370 (Texas Titans)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Helotes, TX
Posts: 445
Michael Blake has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Blake has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Blake has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Blake has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Blake has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Blake has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Blake has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Blake has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Blake has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Blake has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Blake has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mythical Six Week Build Season

This may have been mentioned earlier and I missed the post but I remember a video back in 2011 where Dean Kamen was explaining a purposeful _feature_ of FRC was the 6 Week Build-period.

Dean explained that he wanted FRC teams to have a close to real-life engineering experience where students were given a substantial project to complete, like professional engineers get everyday, without the best budget and not enough time.

I believe he said a survey was done of engineers asking generally how much time their bosses give them to take a concept and then deliver a working machine and the average time came out to 6 weeks--so that's the genesis right there.

I think we need to look at 6 week build as a baked-in pillar by the founder.

On our team since our 2nd season/2012 we have built full-twin practice bots (minus the powder coating) and we just keep whacking-on-it (our term for being iterative - lol) and moving the improvements over to the comp bot till our season ends--we never stop improving/learning.

But we're a well-funded team, hopefully again this season, and I get the cost barrier to some teams to producing a 2nd practice bot. However, there's a way around this, not perfect but it works, and is the approach we took in our Rookie year/2011 when we unexpectedly were on the Alamo winning alliance and on our way to Champs.

What we did was take a load of pictures and exact measurements of our only bot before it was bagged/tagged and impounded for Champs and then we built an inexpensive wood-framed replica of the chassis/structures in order to add an extensive Minibot feature that was completely missing from our competition bot. We put the wood chassis on casters and hand pushed the "bot" to approach and line-up for Minibot deployment--it worked really well in the shop and when we dismantled and installed on the bot in St. Louis everything fit perfectly.

Because of this approach of finding a way to make it work... we were able to have a new offensive capability that resulted in Ranking 17th in Archimedes in 2011--though no one picked us--yes it still stings. ;-)

I only provide this info to highlight that there are ways to achieve success even with a 6 Week Build-period _and_ not enough money to have a second practice bot.

--Michael Blake
__________________
"Retired Insurance Guy"

Link to me on this new fangled-thingy called The Linkedin and help make me popular, or at least appear to be... ;-)
https://www.linkedin.com/in/wmichael...ve_tab_profile

- Head Coach / Founder - FRC 6370 Texas Titans < FRC and VEX teams under development - VRC 15842a >
- President / Founder - San Antonio Competition Robotics Alliance - SACRA 501(c)(3) nonprofit (2012-present)
- Executive Director - Sports-Competition Robotics of Texas Excellence - SCRATE (2016-present)
- Former-Head Coach / Founder - FRC 3481 - Bronc Botz (2011-2016) // C++ Beta Test Team (2012 to 2016)
- Former-Lead Coach (2013-2016) Former-Head Coach (2009-2012) / Co-Founder - FTC 4008 - Bronc Botz (2009-2016) and FTC 4602 - Bronc Botz (2011-2016) and FTC 6976 - Bronc Botz-Nano for middle-schoolers (2013-2016)
- Co-Founder w/Matt Blake - VEX VRC 3481z - Wonder Botz (2011) [for Physically or Mentally Challenged Teens] (2011-2012)

Last edited by Michael Blake : 19-11-2015 at 18:04.
Reply With Quote