Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis
This right here is your biggest assumption - that you need to build two robots to be competitive. As I said, my team never has, and except for two years hasn't even designed improvements after stop build, yet we've been to elims a bunch, finalists a bunch, and winners twice. Yeah, we weren't close to Einstein, but you don't have to be up that high to be competitive or successful with your team.
You are choosing to put that added work on yourselves because you feel the benefit outweighs the cost - but it's not something that is required to be competitive.
|
You are assuming that your team's record qualifies as "competitive".
I suppose we (and many others) may have different definitions of "competitive".
-Mike