View Single Post
  #52   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-11-2015, 18:06
gblake's Avatar
gblake gblake is offline
6th Gear Developer; Mentor
AKA: Blake Ross
no team (6th Gear)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,936
gblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond repute
Re: POLL: Six Week Build Season

Quote:
Originally Posted by techhelpbb View Post
A) Well since this thread spawned from another topic may I call you out on my posts in that topic to this effect? ... In fairness there are several strong feelings being expressed in both topics so I am not surprised by page 10 no one can remember what happened on page 4.
Well, no, to a large extent I don't think you can. I wrote about this thread, not about your posts in that other thread. But you are right that it's easier to lose sight of the original question/sentiments the longer a thread is used. [EDIT] I have to eat my words somewhat here. I went back and double-checked. My impression had been strongly colored by what has been written in the other closely-related thread(s). So, to a certain techelpbb *can* call me out. [/EDIT]

Quote:
Originally Posted by techhelpbb View Post
B) They may not agree with the tone but it's hard to argue that building a second robot when 14% of your teams can't, over this rule, is not wasteful and doesn't exclude that 14%.
If two to three days is enough time for a well-prepared group to build a successful-on-the-field, fun-to-use robot; how on earth does the current 44 day build season (or one that was a true 44-day build season) keep any team from building two, or three, or 44/3 = 14 robots????

Blake
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate

Last edited by gblake : 20-11-2015 at 22:20.
Reply With Quote