20-11-2015, 18:22
|
 |
6th Gear Developer; Mentor
AKA: Blake Ross
no team (6th Gear)
Team Role: Mentor
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,934
|
|
|
Re: Mythical Six Week Build Season
Quote:
Originally Posted by KrazyCarl92
How did you go about determining this was a lower return at a higher investment? Is it not a plausible scenario where it is a greater return on a lower investment?
|
The long answer is long.
The short answer is the prima facie evidence supplied by the highly-visible "build a robot in a weekend" fun stunts, and by the posts written by folks like MrForbes.
I don't see a strong (certainly not strong enough) correlation between the length of the build season and a team's ability to successfully participate in the tournament part of inspiring students. Other factors appear to dominate, and I would much rather see the organization and the community of participants focus on those other factors, instead of on build-season-length or on creating/enhancing a second build season by eliminating bagging (if I understand the intent of eliminating bagging).
Blake
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases  I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate
|