Thread: Web interface
View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-11-2015, 21:14
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,687
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Web interface

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ari423 View Post
Just wondering, what is the advantage of using a web interface over a Java, LabVIEW, or C++ (or other) NetworkTables dashboard? I have heard of a few teams using a web interface but I have never heard a good reason why.
Different skillset - different languages and approach to end-to-end programming. Static/traditional programmers are (usually) bad at designing aesthetically-pleasing displays, whereas web people have to focus on style as part of their layouts. Web programmers are also usually looking for something to do towards the end of build season.

On the flip side, web technologies are pretty finicky when it comes to things like touch, external UIs (HUDs like Oculus Rift, e.g.) or other ways of interacting with the robot (Cheezy Vision, e.g.).

If vision is performed on the display laptop, it's often simpler to simply put the vision output on a display that's directly attached to the process which performs the vision processing. Vision, afaik, has absolutely terrible, rotten performance in web languages (except for perhaps Go) so Java/C++ is preferred.

It would be nice if the robot 'came' with a reliable webserver that had all of this data rather than having to use NetworkTables. That way any programmer, whether they're learning web, mobile or embedded, could do something with the robot data. We could also publish calls to the robot. We had on-field connection issues with our stuff in 2015, but we didn't in 2014.
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
CAD Library Updated 5/1/16 - 2016 Curie/Carver Industrial Design Winner
GitHub