View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-12-2015, 22:51
GeeTwo's Avatar
GeeTwo GeeTwo is offline
Technical Director
AKA: Gus Michel II
FRC #3946 (Tiger Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 3,564
GeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Three Mini-CIMs in a gearbox?

Because of the extra motor controller required, and the increased cost/weight/complexity of a 3 motor gearbox, you would almost have to be in some sort of edge case in order to want to make this trade. That said, I can think of a number of those cases pretty easily:
  • Out of CIMs according to rules (most likely useful only if CIMs and Mini-CIMs draw large currents at different times)
  • You need a bit of extra torque-to-speed trade space (e.g. for a lifter), but not enough to justify a shifter. This takes advantage of the fact that you can (for example) run 3 miniCIMS at a total of 120A for much longer than you can 2 CIMS without tripping breakers.
  • Short depth available behind gearbox
__________________

If you can't find time to do it right, how are you going to find time to do it over?
If you don't pass it on, it never happened.
Robots are great, but inspiration is the reason we're here.
Friends don't let friends use master links.