View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-22-2015, 11:44 AM
MichaelBick MichaelBick is offline
Registered User
FRC #1836 (MilkenKnights)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 732
MichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant future
Re: Motion Planning and sensor integration

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ty Tremblay View Post
I would suggest simply relying on encoders in FRC, but if you want to implement sensor fusion, I suggest relying on your encoder values for actual robot movement and using your gyro for checks and balances. (For example, if your robot's wheels are not on the ground, your encoder values will still show the bot as moving, but your gyro will show no angular accelerations other than noise. From this, you can determine that your bot probably didn't move.)
There has been an influx of very good gyros for FRC. Specifically the NavX is accurate over long periods of time, and even has a form of sensor fusion like you were talking about. It can be set up to rezero using the magnetometer when the robot stops moving. If you can afford it, using good gyro will give you a lot of improved performance over just using encoders.
__________________
Team 1836 - The Milken Knights
2013 LA Regional Champions with 1717 and 973
2012 LA Regional Finalists with 294 and 973
To follow Team 1836 on Facebook, go to http://www.facebook.com/MilkenKnights
To go to our website, go to http://milkenknights.com/index.html