View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-12-2015, 22:02
apalrd's Avatar
apalrd apalrd is offline
More Torque!
AKA: Andrew Palardy (Most people call me Palardy)
VRC #3333
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Auburn Hills, MI
Posts: 1,347
apalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: An Approach to Robot Control

I haven't been on CD in awhile and didn't see this, but it's interesting to me.

Your paper appears to be very object-oriented-centric although the concepts themselves could be ported to other paradigms. Moving the block-diagram to the beginning might help with this, and switching from code snippets to more abstract figures and psudocode could help with readability. I honestly don't know C++11 (I learned C++ before 11 and haven't used it since), and I had to look up your note on the 'auto' keyword.

As to the overall architecture:
-Could the status block be removed, as the status-detail should contain all of the information and the method is usually a passthrough?
-Could the ready block be removed, and included in status-detail struct?
__________________
Kettering University - Computer Engineering
Kettering Motorsports
Williams International - Commercial Engines - Controls and Accessories
FRC 33 - The Killer Bees - 2009-2012 Student, 2013-2014 Advisor
VEX IQ 3333 - The Bumble Bees - 2014+ Mentor

"Sometimes, the elegant implementation is a function. Not a method. Not a class. Not a framework. Just a function." ~ John Carmack
Reply With Quote