View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-12-2015, 22:40
GeeTwo's Avatar
GeeTwo GeeTwo is offline
Technical Director
AKA: Gus Michel II
FRC #3946 (Tiger Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 3,605
GeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FTC]: Experience with new REV servos?

I don't see anything obvious, so let's start with the basics.
  • Double check your math. If you give us some model numbers and such for the servo and reduction system, we can do this as well. Also compare the peak current draw of the servo against the peak supply of the programmer.
  • Check the batteries in the servo programmer. You never know.
  • Run the servo with no load (not connected to the arm) using the servo programmer. Is the top speed about right? If you can check it easily (a load on an arm) is the top torque about right?
  • Check the 10:1 gear reduction for binding or other inefficiencies. Can you operate it manually, and if so, does it go smoothly? The loss in a 10:1 gear box should only be 10-25% depending on type and quality (better for simple spurs or planetary, not so good for bevel gears or worm).

Quote:
Originally Posted by madz View Post
(Can the GDC make an exception so we can use 9 motors instead of 8? )
Sure, they can. But I'd bet you lunch they won't.
__________________

If you can't find time to do it right, how are you going to find time to do it over?
If you don't pass it on, it never happened.
Robots are great, but inspiration is the reason we're here.
Friends don't let friends use master links.

Last edited by GeeTwo : 29-12-2015 at 22:42.
Reply With Quote