View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2016, 17:25
asid61's Avatar
asid61 asid61 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Anand Rajamani
FRC #0115 (MVRT)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 2,216
asid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2x1x1/16 Belt-In-Tube

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
The combination of 9mm wide belts and 24T pulleys, especially with 6" wheels, has been tried in FRC before by several teams with problems. Ratcheting and tensile belt failure are among the issues teams ran into.
It seems a lot of teams have had this problem, and some have not. The move to 4-cim drives to replace 6-cim might help mitigate it a bit, but I guess time will tell (or good testing).

Broaching pulleys from SDP-SI or using larger pulleys from Vex and turning down the flanges would allow you to use a slightly larger pulley and reduce the risk of belt breakage.
__________________
<Now accepting CAD requests and commissions>