Quote:
Originally Posted by zinthorne
Well I decided to look into the history of teams with the same team numbers as listed. If you go in order from the begging starting with 9. (Number for reference 9328490238209) 9 does not exist anymore. 3 no longer exists. 2 no longer exists. 8 does exist, but when changed to 84, that team does not exist. 9 does not exist. 0 does not exist. 2 does not exist. 3 does not exist. 8 does exist, but 82 does not exist. 0 does not exist. 9 does not exist.
I don't know if this means anything, but I find it interesting that most of the numbers that are listed are of teams that do not exist excluding 8 and 4. Yet when 8 is combined with the net number in the sequence that team does not exist. 9 is listed on TBA but stopped playing years ago. Maybe research into team names or something common of the teams that don't exist? I used TBA to look up team numbers. I find it hard to believe that it is possible for this to happen so easily...
|
I feel like its all related. The prime numbers, web tiz beta x, and the team numbers.
I found this definition of beta on Merriam Webster.
Quote:
|
a measure of the risk potential of a stock or an investment portfolio expressed as a ratio of the stock's or portfolio's volatility to the volatility of the market as a whole
|
The "risk potential of a stock" could be the significance of the number referred to by SpaceBiz.
They want to baffle us so they give us something as hard as this.
Thank you FIRST.
