Thread: FIRST STRONGHOLD Discussion
View Single Post
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2016, 11:57
Cyberphil's Avatar
Cyberphil Cyberphil is offline
That Guy
AKA: Phil
FRC #0103 (Cybersonics)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Kintersville
Posts: 755
Cyberphil has much to be proud ofCyberphil has much to be proud ofCyberphil has much to be proud ofCyberphil has much to be proud ofCyberphil has much to be proud ofCyberphil has much to be proud ofCyberphil has much to be proud ofCyberphil has much to be proud ofCyberphil has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to Cyberphil
Re: FIRST STRONGHOLD Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by XaulZan11 View Post
It reminds me of 2012 and I predict it will play out similarly. Smart teams should have a significant advantage early as they will be focusing on barriers and scoring low while non-experienced teams will likely be attempting to score high.
Though it is somewhat similar to 2012, one team on an alliance can get 4 ranking points while another team has the possibility to get 0 (not winning, not damaging the defense, not capturing the tower).

This is very different from 2012 where if cooperation happened both alliances received ranking points.
Reply With Quote