View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2016, 14:33
Canon reeves Canon reeves is offline
Registered User
FRC #4490 (That One Team)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 296
Canon reeves has much to be proud ofCanon reeves has much to be proud ofCanon reeves has much to be proud ofCanon reeves has much to be proud ofCanon reeves has much to be proud ofCanon reeves has much to be proud ofCanon reeves has much to be proud ofCanon reeves has much to be proud ofCanon reeves has much to be proud of
Re: Pneumatics or Mecanum

It depends on your strategy, but:

Pneumatics:
- High traction

- Can act as shocks for the robot when crossing defenses

-Doesn't allow you to be pushed in a direction perpendicular to your wheels

-Allows for simpler drivetrain

-You only have to power two sides of your drivetrain, so better motor
allocation with 3 motor gear boxes

-Can climb over obstacles (depending on drivetrain)

-Defending your tower is always an option if something fails

Mecanum:
-Can strafe

-Can be pushed in any direction

-Likely not enough traction to go up the ramps, and definitely not over the defenses like the moat and bumpy road.

- Less dependable, more to go wrong

-If you use 4 wheels, the most power you can give to each wheel would likely be a CIM and miniCIM, so not as fast as a robot that uses 6 CIM motors in its drivetrain

-Little to no use on defense, most robots can push you around

Your team can choose which ever it thinks is best for your strategy, but I highly recommend not using mecanum wheels. If you think its worth it, just compare it to other drive trains using a decision matrix with objectives such as durability, multi-functionality, ease of build, and complexity.