View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2016, 21:41
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is online now
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,630
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: New Track Option

In general, when using #35 chain in our drive systems, we purchase chain in 10' lengths, break it to the length we need, and use a singular master link to join the ends of the chain. If there were a similar option available for this product (though in perhaps less than 10' segments), it would likely increase appeal somewhat (at least for us).

Apologies about misquoting the price. I simply multiplied 16 links by the pitch of #35 chain, without really thinking about it. I feel silly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrnoble View Post
It's a fascinating product, BUT

if I'm reading your pricing correctly, one link = one piece of chain. For #35, that means 2 links per inch, and if I assume a roughly 30" length for the side of the robot, we are looking at more than $700 per robot for black track (I didn't price the other colors, so I don't know if black is cheaper than red, say). That's pricey.

Am I reading this wrong?
For reference, that length of Brecoflex will set you back $200-300 per side of the machine, not counting the pulleys. The Andymark rhino system is $369 per side (with pulleys/plates/etc). No track system is going to be cheap.
__________________
Being correct doesn't mean you don't have to explain yourself.

Last edited by Lil' Lavery : 10-01-2016 at 21:46.
Reply With Quote