View Single Post
  #39   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2016, 00:00
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,600
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: Two Boulder Auto

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexanderTheOK View Post
It doesn't seem like you remember EITHER of those games. In 2013 you weren't allowed to COMPLETELY cross the line. This means your margin of error is the width of your robot, or most likely the width of your intake, again, several feet.

I've never seen a robot that consistently moved to within +-2 inches in the long axis. If you have an example please share.
I remember both of those games plenty well. Please watch your tone.

The exact specifics of the rules in 2013 vs 2016 differ (obviously), but the intent is largely the same. The margin for error for many teams was rather small, especially when it came to aligning their intake devices. The specific example I had in mind:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2j9ov03mOyA (987)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9fHnHGvM8s (987, gets hit, corrects, still makes shots)
__________________
Being correct doesn't mean you don't have to explain yourself.
Reply With Quote