Thread: Rookie Stratagy
View Single Post
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2016, 11:32
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,326
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: Rookie Stratagy

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdaming View Post
Is 6 CIM really required? Seems to me if the team had the ability to add a 3rd CIM they would be better off with a shifting gearbox or one that was geared down from the KOP
I'm not sure how much 6 CIMs will help you on the field, but I do know they will help you get selected as a 3rd robot. I've been on alliances where teams made our short list of 3rd robots just because they had 6 CIMs.

My previous post wasn't suggesting teams shouldn't be more than just a drivetrain that plays defense. I'm advising teams to not sacrifice their drive train or driver practice to add additional capabilities. Spending 5 weeks on a high goal scorer or climber while their drivetrain isn't reliable and drivers aren't practiced is a bad idea. Building a new, untested, articulated drivetrain (look back at some very good teams that struggled in 2010 due to fancy yet ineffective drivetrains) to weaken defenses instead of building a more simple tank drive is also a bad idea.
Reply With Quote