View Single Post
  #37   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2016, 16:37
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,326
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: The "noodle agreement" is back! Now the defense agreement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterG View Post
Voluntarily choosing weak defenses seem to violate the spirit of this rule if not the letter.
I think the manual is clear with the intent of the rule. See the blue box under T8: "FIRST considers the action of a Team influencing another Team to throw a MATCH, to deliberately miss Ranking Points, etc. incompatible with FIRST values and not a strategy any team should employ"

The blue box doesn't say playing below ones abilities is against FIRST values, but the action of influencing another team to do so.

It is a subtle, but significant difference in my opinion. If playing below one's abilities was against FIRST values, then I'd argue teams that switch drive teams throughout an event, test out a new feature that probably won't work in a match or showcase specific abilities for alliance selection are in violation of T8 since they are not giving 100% to win that specific match.