View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2016, 19:36
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
FRC #1732
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,329
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: The "noodle agreement" is back! Now the defense agreement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bduddy View Post
T8 does exactly what you're talking about: it prohibits you from sandbagging based on influence by outside sources. You're reading it incorrectly.
I would agree with this based on how the rules are written, but I feel the rules are written incorrectly based on the intent in the blue box, which indicates FIRST disagrees with telling other teams to sandbag. Based on how it is written, I can go around telling every team to sandbag and be perfectly legal. But, if any team listens to me, they get a yellow/red card. (I don't think this will ever be called so I'm not sure it really matters).