View Single Post
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2016, 17:38
plnyyanks's Avatar
plnyyanks plnyyanks is offline
Data wins arguments.
AKA: Phil Lopreiato
FRC #1124 (The ÜberBots), FRC #2900 (The Mighty Penguins)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: NYC/Washington, DC
Posts: 1,113
plnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Car Nack Predicts 16-1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Donow View Post
Bouncing off of this, does anyone have the data on the % of #1 seeds that won their events over the past few years?
I was curious too, so I whipped up a quick script to find out. Script and full output are available on my GitHub: https://gist.github.com/phil-lopreia...276a608edc7de4

Code:
Overall 266 of 435 events were won by top seeds (61.1494252874 percent)
  In 2011, 41 of 62 events were won by top seeds (66.1290322581 percent)
  In 2012, 46 of 73 events were won by top seeds (63.0136986301 percent)
  In 2013, 46 of 81 events were won by top seeds (56.7901234568 percent)
  In 2014, 51 of 102 events were won by top seeds (50.0 percent)
  In 2015, 82 of 117 events were won by top seeds (70.0854700855 percent)
So Car Nack's prediction of <25% would make this year a pretty significant outlier when compared to the past 5.
__________________
Phil Lopreiato - "It's a hardware problem"
Team 1124 (2010 - 2013), Team 1418 (2014), Team 2900 (2016)
FRC Notebook The Blue Alliance for Android

Last edited by plnyyanks : 12-01-2016 at 17:52.
Reply With Quote