Thread: build season needs to be longer.
View Single Post
  #32   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-01-2016, 22:28
gblake's Avatar
gblake gblake is offline
6th Gear Developer; Mentor
AKA: Blake Ross
no team (6th Gear)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: May 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,940
gblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond repute
Re: build season needs to be longer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Sevcik View Post
Pretty sure a lot of top-ranked teams would disagree with you on this. Also a lot of mentor family members. My wife, in particular, laughs every time I claim FRC has a 6-week build season.
And I'm pretty sure that you mean that many teams that do well on-the-field choose to work beyond the 44 days in various legal ways.

I know working on the Withholding Allowance parts is in addition to the 44 days.
I know that time spent during competitions, is in addition to the 44 days.
I know that legal prep/practice before kickoff is more than the 44 days.
I know that off-season events is more than the 44 days.

I also know that many of the members of the teams that do well on the field are able to do that without letting the rest of their lives get out-of-kilter.

However, none of that changes two things.
A) The reason(s) the program currently presents all teams with the challenge(s) it does, and
B) Investing time into building and operating an uber-bot is by no means the only dimension of being a top-ranked FRC team. Many teams that build uber-bots are good at many other aspects of FRC (and vice-versa), but building uber-bots is not the same thing as succeeding at FRC.

My thesis was and is that each time someone wishes for a longer build season, it's worth pausing for a minute to ask if what they are wishing for is really necessary for succeeding at FRC. In my experience, the answer is usually an easy, "No."
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate
Last edited by gblake : 16-01-2016 at 22:30.
Reply With Quote