View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-01-2016, 09:50
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,685
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Extendable Arm/Hanger Subsystem? What works best?

Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewdenny View Post
For those who were wondering, like me, (heres my back of an envelope calculations)

140 Lb robot = 622N
climbing ~1m in 1 sec = 622 watts.
1 CIM = 337 watts
You could climb in 1 sec with 2 CIMs, but it would be close and your extension to get the bar in the first place would have to be nearly instant.
In the last 20 seconds you can drive around the opponent's courtyard fully extended, regardless of whether you're on the batter or not. So 17 second of extending while driving around still scoring, plus 3 seconds for the lift itself.

Supposing the 40A breakers can handle the over-current match-to-match attached is how it's potentially done in under 1 second. Of course, the 80% gearbox efficiency doesn't account for the winch and any associated pulley inefficiency. I also divide JVN's current draw per motor by the efficiency just as a rough estimate of how much extra current is pulled due to these inefficiencies.

This particular setup would also need anti-backdrive.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Scaling Motor Calc.png
Views:	101
Size:	20.7 KB
ID:	19810  
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
CAD Library Updated 5/1/16 - 2016 Curie/Carver Industrial Design Winner
GitHub
Reply With Quote