View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2016, 08:56
D_Price's Avatar
D_Price D_Price is offline
Engineer/Mentor
AKA: Derek
FRC #1708 (Amp'd Robotics (formally Natural Selection))
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: McKeesport, Pa
Posts: 399
D_Price has much to be proud ofD_Price has much to be proud ofD_Price has much to be proud ofD_Price has much to be proud ofD_Price has much to be proud ofD_Price has much to be proud ofD_Price has much to be proud ofD_Price has much to be proud ofD_Price has much to be proud of
Re: Gearing a Rotating Arm

You may want to tone down the speed if you are rotating the shooter up and down at those angles unless the "boulder" is firmly secured you could lose it when rotating.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kitare102 View Post
Our current robot design includes a dual-flywheel shooter on an angle-adjustable arm which we are currently trying to figure out how to rotate. For reference, the arm can be approximated by a mass of 3.5kg at .3m from the pivot. Our question is what would be a good way of gearing the arm such that it is responsive. To make another approximation, let's say "responsive" means traveling from horizontal (0 degree) to 45 degrees in .5 seconds, which should really be taken as a guideline over a restriction for the design.

The current model involves a versaplanetary (motor and stages undecided) followed by a sprocket stage which is necessary for the placement of the gearbox but can be made a reduction anywhere from 1:1 to around 4:1. Is a versaplanetary a good choice for this situation? If so, where to go from there and if not, what other options have teams used?
__________________
Team member 2004-2008
Team mentor 2008-20XX

http://team1708.steelcityrobotics.or...tics/Home.html
"Education is a powerful tool. Always use it to better someone else's life"