|
Re: 775 Pro Coupling
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Wallace
I agree with all your points regarding proper interference fit, and reaming is clearly a better method. I think we just got lucky with the #9 drill. Over the past 30 years, I have press fit a lot of motor shafts from 2mm through 17mm diameter and have developed a feel for the forces involved, so I am pretty confident of the results we got on a few motors. I would not use the same method in serial production.
To your question: I'd go with the 0.1955" ream. We will probably do the same when I need to make more components.
|
Thanks for the input. I'm afraid in the process of removing the improper pinions we may have damaged our motor set, so my intent is to use the .196" drill for this first set of questionable motors to be used in program testing and development, then put in our order for a competition set and back ups for those at which point we may go ahead and get the reamer and take that time.
For anyone wondering, the reamer is McMaster part number 8803A32. You have to specify that you want the .1955" from the range associated with that part number.
__________________
2006-2008 FIRST Team 1741 Red Alert-Founding Student
2008-2011 FIRST Team 1747 Harrison Boiler Robotics-College Mentor
2012 FIRST Team 4272 Maverick Boiler Robotics-Founding College Mentor
2013-Present FIRST Team 1747 Harrison Boiler Robotics-Engineering Mentor
2015-Present Ri3D Team Indiana - Mechanical and Fabrication
Last edited by BoilerMentor : 26-01-2016 at 11:17.
Reason: Added McMaster info for reamer.
|