|
Re: How many times is enough to prove consistency?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tindleroot
While you present a great theory, scouting depends on some sort of measurement. I am trying to consider a good compromise in order to minimize data accumulated and still determine consistency to a predictable degree. For me, if I saw a robot cross 5 times successfully, I would trust them to continue doing it (as long as those 5 crosses were not among a sea of failures, and the trend does not change sporadically throughout the competition). Hanging, I would want to make sure they make it every time.
Honestly, I don't expect teams to be particularly inconsistent with the defenses they are intending to cross. Either they will cross or they won't. But now that I say that, the opposite will probably happen.
|
Five times is great. But most events have 7-10 rounds. Did your team accomplish this task 5 times out of 7, or 10? Did they do this within traffic, or did this do this with impunity?
Consistency is great - but your scouting better be ready to address the other issues involved or the better scouting from another alliance may beat you.
__________________
"An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it" ~JFK
Last edited by Chief Hedgehog : 27-01-2016 at 03:06.
|