View Single Post
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-02-2016, 10:23
dusty_nv dusty_nv is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 18
dusty_nv is a name known to alldusty_nv is a name known to alldusty_nv is a name known to alldusty_nv is a name known to alldusty_nv is a name known to alldusty_nv is a name known to all
Re: NVIDIA Jetson TX1

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanelss View Post
I was not aware that was an otg port, if it is I guess I could try that too.

the tk1 gets 5-7fps with the depth viewer on 720p so it sounds like the tx1 is ~3x faster with that type of load(assuming by hd you mean 720p rather than any of the higher resolutions). certainly an improvement but not as much as one would hope and the other question is if it's worth spending $300 for that...... corrupt frames are still an issue though so it may be worth the upgrade just to mitigate that issue...
The team at Stereolabs has been working with our optimization guru's over here at NVIDIA, so there's a chance that the performance gains could continue to improve throughout the season. If the speed/throughput of the stereo disparity calculations is your primary concern, there are a couple approaches you could take to mitigate - Stereolab's disparity depth field is high-quality - you could try using stereo block matching from VisionWorks or OpenCV which may be acceptable to your application. If you want to offload the formulation of the stereo depth field, there are also various structured light and time-of-flight sensors available which provide the depth field straight away, leaving more headroom for exploitation on the host.