View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-02-2016, 00:53
ImMoMo's Avatar
ImMoMo ImMoMo is online now
Registered User
AKA: Mo
FRC #2559 (Normality Zero)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: May 2015
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 52
ImMoMo is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: pic: 2559 Normality Zero 2016 Drive Train v1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Certified Nerd View Post
All I can see is your pile of 9 fluke multimeters.
Haha, our school is a career/vocational school, so those fluke meters actually are property of the school, however, our robotics team is allowed to use them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallry View Post
Can't really see the front of the robot too well, but I trust you're obeying R19 and R26?
While the bumpers are not currently on the frame, we will be able to abide by those rules.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bEdhEd View Post
I'd be weary of damaging the internals of the battery with its flat position, especially with the high shock nature of this game around the outer works. Is this an issue that was considered in the design and is there a way you're going to prevent any battery damage?
The mounting and positioning of the battery on this chassis are not finalized, this current configuration was just for prototyping purposes. The battery will not be mounted in the back for weight distribution purposes. You bring up a very good point regarding the "shock" this game will have, we have realized this already, and will most likely place the battery elsewhere.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaddeusMaximus View Post
Like it, but my gut says that you should be better cross bracing. Right now that middle link acts as a two force member that can only transmit tension/compression, not bending or shearing forces.
There will be more cross/bracing support once the other mechanical mechanisms have been mounted.. however, from our testing, this frame seems to be very sturdy!
Reply With Quote