Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard
254 was pretty screwed by the rock wall change, cost them over a week I heard.
Had to switch from regular swerve to tank tread swerve.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by evanperryg
I doubt that a 3 cycler alliance, at least at low to middle levels of play, would be able to cycle fast enough for the low bar ability to become a significant advantage. Keep in mind a strong alliance will need both breach and tower points, so these teams will have to go through the other defenses for most of the match anyway, nullifying much of the low bar cycling strength.
I heard they also had to rework the drop-down mecanums, too.
|
Nonsense. They just had to add another couple of percent to the duration they ran the four big fans.
I don't know about Karthik, but the main thing that would be terrifying to me is if a significant percentage of robots are planning to
only cross the outer works at the low bar. This would lead to easy defense, significant traffic jams, and the category C defenses (drawbridge and sally port) being in position 5 most matches.