View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-02-2016, 10:22
IKE's Avatar
IKE IKE is online now
Not so Custom User Title
AKA: Isaac Rife
no team (N/A)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,149
IKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Q774 and the Supreme Bumper Mounts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Procolsaurus View Post
It appears that Q744 enables some more ridiculous bumper designs than I have ever seen or thought of. Imagine that the fastener from Figure 4-7: BUMPER Vertical Cross Section extended 25 inches to the FRAME PERIMETER on the opposite side of the robot, potentially acting as a cross brace for the robot.


Do you think a design like this is...
A) Illegal, this is an incorrect interpretation of the rules.
B) Legal but a bad idea, may need to explain the legality to an Inspector.
C) Legal, but likely to cause a change in the rules to prevent it.
D) Legal, and a great idea
I have observed "similar" strategies in the past. Just remember, it hinges on how your team answers:
Is this part of the Robot, or a bumper bracket/attachment?

Then makes sure the team going through inspection has it weighed that way as well. I have observed some very elaborate brackets in the past.
Reply With Quote