[petercooperjr]

My first thoughts:

No G43. Redabot1 successfully completed its crossing, and Blueabot1 did not interfere with it.

G24 is one of those rules that requires referees to read the drive teams' minds. If I thought that Redabot1 performed its actions as part of a strategy to damage Blueabot1, or vice versa, then I would access the penalty accordingly. My gut, from your description, is that most likely they were each just trying to play the game, and the tangled mess wasn't really what anybody was going for. But really subtle differences in descriptions of what happened can very much change my mind as to what was and wasn't intentional.