View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-02-2016, 13:57
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,625
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [YMTC]: Defending the Defenses

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Lightning View Post
Could you clarify why there would be a pinning foul on blue if blue could still move and red could not. I get why there would be no foul on red if blue was still able to move, but why would they get a foul if red couldn't move because red landed on them?
The premise in the scenario is that 'everyone' knows Redabot1 jumps the defense. It also seems to be implied that this jump is the only way Redabot1 can traverse the defense. It is also stated in such a way that Blueabot1's actions are obviously intentional.

Blueabot1 moved into position in order to inhibit movement after Redabot1 landed, but instead wound up with Redabot1 on top of it. Rather than inhibiting movement, Redabot1 is likely completely immobile for longer than 5 seconds. Redabot1 is completely immobile as a direct result of the defensive strategy and actions Blueabot1 took. Blueabot didn't intend to be landed on, yet should have seen it as a risk given what 'everyone' knows.
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
CAD Library Updated 5/1/16 - 2016 Curie/Carver Industrial Design Winner
GitHub
Reply With Quote