View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-02-2016, 14:10
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,625
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [YMTC]: Defending the Defenses

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Lightning View Post
But as I understand the clarification in the blue box the definition is a action to prevent movement, not inhibit movement. And as you said Blueabot didn't intended to be landed on, so it follows that they didn't intend to prevent the movement of Redabot only inconvenience it, which is not a foul.
The rules for pinning do not specify that intent is a consideration with regards to pinning.

I see it as similar to all of the rules/Q&A rulings surrounding situations where a robot breaks down in the secret passage, or in the courtyard (especially near the batter) during the last 30 seconds.

edit - also, the blue box implies inhibiting movement - a robot that is 'pinned' on the batter can probably wiggle enough to be seen moving, yet is still strictly confined to a small area due to the as-clarified pin.
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
CAD Library Updated 5/1/16 - 2016 Curie/Carver Industrial Design Winner
GitHub

Last edited by JesseK : 18-02-2016 at 14:15.
Reply With Quote