View Single Post
  #38   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-02-2016, 22:13
apalrd's Avatar
apalrd apalrd is offline
More Torque!
AKA: Andrew Palardy (Most people call me Palardy)
VRC #3333
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Auburn Hills, MI
Posts: 1,347
apalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Poll: How many CIMs are you using?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkelleyrtp View Post
I'm curious as to the appeal for bag motors for the intake. Originally we had bag motors as well, but after the reduction required to get that 13,000 rpm to something usable and the potential for busting a motor, we switched to a minicim. It's more robust, requires less reduction, and can be run longer without overheating. The two disadvantages would be the size and power draw, but I don't find it significant enough to get a 100:1 versa and not direct drive.
It's all about power and weight.

BAG motors are good for ~150 watts of power and is listed at 0.71 lbs
MiniCIMs are good for ~215 and 2.16 lbs

So changing from a BAG motor to a MiniCIM gets you ~45% more power but with 200% more weight. For comparison, a 775Pro is rated at 130% more power and 12% more weight to a BAG.

If you don't need 215 watts, a BAG motor is a lighter and smaller alternative. If you need 215 watts or more, than the BAG motor isn't the right choice. Overall though, it's an excellent motor for most small mechanisms on robots.
__________________
Kettering University - Computer Engineering
Kettering Motorsports
Williams International - Commercial Engines - Controls and Accessories
FRC 33 - The Killer Bees - 2009-2012 Student, 2013-2014 Advisor
VEX IQ 3333 - The Bumble Bees - 2014+ Mentor

"Sometimes, the elegant implementation is a function. Not a method. Not a class. Not a framework. Just a function." ~ John Carmack
Reply With Quote