View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-02-2016, 13:20
araniaraniratul's Avatar
araniaraniratul araniaraniratul is offline
294-Alum
AKA: Arani (Ron) Bhattacharyay
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Berkeley, California
Posts: 57
araniaraniratul is a jewel in the rougharaniaraniratul is a jewel in the rougharaniaraniratul is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to araniaraniratul
Re: Overview and Analysis of FIRST Stats

Quote:
Originally Posted by Citrus Dad View Post
Yes, that's the added step that's needed. As mentioned below, look at the equations on p. 15 and p. 19 to see how to do this.

I also like the MMSE adjustment. However, one important point. This is a Bayesian estimation method. The errors terms around initial "guess" is normally distributed (or log normally since scores are constrained at zero), and presumably so are the regression results errors. But adding together 2 normal distributions does not result in a normal distribution. It's been 20 years since I looked at this issue, but there is software out there that correctly computes the resulting distribution.
Is it because they're not independent? (Unless my understanding of random variables is way off) Otherwise I feel like two independent random variables (normal) in summation still leaves you with a new normal random variable. In terms of software, I know that numpy does a ton of those corrections, but not sure about this specific one.
__________________

The Greybots
973
- Mentor

Beach Cities Robotics
294
- Student/Mentor

The Sloth Bears
5499
- Mentor
Reply With Quote