View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-03-2016, 12:42
SJaladi's Avatar
SJaladi SJaladi is offline
Mechanical Mentor
AKA: Sarath Jaladi
FRC #1923 (The MidKnight Inventors)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 39
SJaladi has a reputation beyond reputeSJaladi has a reputation beyond reputeSJaladi has a reputation beyond reputeSJaladi has a reputation beyond reputeSJaladi has a reputation beyond reputeSJaladi has a reputation beyond reputeSJaladi has a reputation beyond reputeSJaladi has a reputation beyond reputeSJaladi has a reputation beyond reputeSJaladi has a reputation beyond reputeSJaladi has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Gearbox Design for an FTC Robot

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cothron Theiss View Post
Though, wouldn't a bag CIM with a 100:1 planetary reduction give comparable speed and torque to your current solution with much less weight and complexity? Just a thought.
BAG motors are not legal for FTC, though you could remove the motor from the AM gearbox and put it into a versaplanetary gearbox wth a 100:1 reduction.

Addressing the original question, I don't believe that this setup would cause you any issues as long as you keep in mind that the middle motor will have to spin opposite to the top and bottom motor for this gear train to function. As long as you mind that I think you'll be okay. If you don't mind me asking, what sort of mechanism is this gear train powering? Using three motors on one mechanism when you're limited to 8 motors seems a bit excessive. Perhaps you could use a larger reduction to accomplish the same task?