View Single Post
  #128   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-03-2016, 14:15
FarmerJohn FarmerJohn is offline
Pre-Rookie team
AKA: John Reynolds
no team (Turlock Titans)
Team Role: Team Spirit / Cheering
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Rookie Year: 2016
Location: Turlock
Posts: 58
FarmerJohn has a reputation beyond reputeFarmerJohn has a reputation beyond reputeFarmerJohn has a reputation beyond reputeFarmerJohn has a reputation beyond reputeFarmerJohn has a reputation beyond reputeFarmerJohn has a reputation beyond reputeFarmerJohn has a reputation beyond reputeFarmerJohn has a reputation beyond reputeFarmerJohn has a reputation beyond reputeFarmerJohn has a reputation beyond reputeFarmerJohn has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Team Update 14 (2016)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrennanB View Post
My answer to you is: (feel free to sub out 1114 for any xxxx team you feel like)

Also, since this isn't legal for an FRC game, I don't forsee any team taking you up on this offer to copy 118 (or any robot), spending plenty of manhours and thousands of dollars for an illegal robot just to prove you wrong.
I said design. I never said build. It takes no money to design, and since you're so against improving robots between now and competition, you seem to have plenty of time to make a design in four weeks using what you've seen in this video. This is all theory. So come on, Brennan. I'm challenging you. If you think it's possible to look at a robot and copy the entire design, prove it to me. Deliver a cad model of a robot that other people believe could be just as functional as 118's robot in four weeks and I'll back you on everything you've said so far. Individual subsystems don't count, because those are copied year in and year out, that's just how engineering works. And if you "don't forsee any team taking...up on this offer to copy [a robot] (or any robot), spending plenty of manhours and thousands of dollars for [what could be a legal robot if they used their withholding weight correctly]", then you seem to be contradicting your previous statements that teams *would* in fact do this.

You're spewing a lot of BS with no backing and everything you claim to be fact is all hypothetical theory.
Reply With Quote