View Single Post
  #38   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-04-2003, 17:09
Rickertsen2 Rickertsen2 is offline
Umm Errr...
None #1139 (Chamblee Gear Grinders)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: ATL
Posts: 1,421
Rickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant future
Send a message via AIM to Rickertsen2 Send a message via Yahoo to Rickertsen2
Quote:
Originally posted by KenWittlief
before you go off the deep end on features you would like to see in a new controller, remember that MANY teams use the defaut code from innovation FIRST in their robot, and never change a single line of it.

In most matches at the regionals, only one or two bots on the field did ANYTHING during auton mode!

if teams cant handle a simple language like pBasic - how would they ever program in C++?
Thats why i vote for a BasicX proccessor. Its still alot like Basic just much more powerful. Just look at this comparison. Its also slightly less expensive than the BSIISX that is in use on the current system. Not to mention that it is pin to pin compatible with the BSIISX so hardly anything would need changing.
__________________
1139 Alumni
Reply With Quote