View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2016, 12:14
hrench's Avatar
hrench hrench is offline
Mechanical build mentor
AKA: Bob Hrenchir
FRC #1108 (Panther Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Paola, KS
Posts: 220
hrench is a name known to allhrench is a name known to allhrench is a name known to allhrench is a name known to allhrench is a name known to allhrench is a name known to all
Re: Drilling holes to reduce frame weight: best pattern

Quote:
Originally Posted by paul.dornfeld View Post
We are reducing the weight by drilling into our 1"X4" hollow, rectangular Al tubing (1/8" thick-walled). Two questions:
  1. What would the best spacing pattern (i.e. square grid, diamond, circular, etc.?)
  2. What would the largest structurally "safe" diameter be?
I agree with the posters that say round holes are best. Also, smaller holes are better for stress (but the same for weight if you remove the same square inches), they'll affect buckling loads less.

I've had good luck making 1 to 1-1/2 inch dia holes with a conduit punch--they look nicer than any drill and they go quickly. You mentioned diamond, so maybe you're intending on NC machining

Also, all of the people worried about strength, I can't think of many areas where you need the amount of strength a 1 x 4 x 1/8" aluminum rectangular section will provide. But I don't know your loading.

Another way to shave weight from such a section would be to thin it using a table-saw with an aluminum blade. This would have the least effect on stress, less than any holes.

Another note: if the tube sees mostly bending, remove holes or thin evenly. across the faces. If the tube sees lots of torsion (twisting), remove more toward the corners and leave the centerline of each face intact. Highest stress in torsion is down the center axis of the face.