Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsonmw04
Chesapeake Region = CHS
C&R = Consent and Release forms. Apparently CHS is required to complete a second, non-STIMS consent and release form that has the exact wording as the STIMS Version. I find the repitition annoying.
more explicit responsibilities = probably the reason for above. what they are I do not know. They have not been communicated to me when I asked about the extra C&R.
lessons learned from PNW = not sure, but I suspect the reasons for the item above.
|
"More explicit responsibilities" is the way I summed up the way FRC is administrated in a district system vs a traditional regional system. The district systems are run by 501c3s that operate interdependently with FIRST while RPCs are more directly agents of HQ. Things like liability insurance are probably under the wings of FiM, PNW, MAR, CHS etc., and therefore we require an additional form to recognize this fact.
Matt, the lessons learned from PNW comes from my research and communications with people in districts leading me to a variety of places. In this specific case it led to
this presentation, which I think we can agree FIRST Chesapeake has taken the guidelines from PNW to heart enough that entire parts of this presentation have been lifted on to documentation we have been getting in emails.