Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirdickey
What's actually interesting in the stats is the rough terrain.
|
The rough terrain wasn't on the field much, but when it was there, alliances appear to have crossed it largely at will (94% of crossing opportunities, damaged 91% of opportunities), although individual teams may have had more trouble.
In my deeper analysis, the group D defense was the rough terrain around 29% of the time. When it was on the field, it was in the audience position 58% of the time. The audience took the rough terrain in 68.7% of selections. Teams picked it only 16% of the time.
The event by event statistics are all over the place, with extremes of rough terrain presence 10% of the time in Auburn Mountainview and 46.7% in Hatboro-Horsham.