View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-03-2016, 15:31
GeeTwo's Avatar
GeeTwo GeeTwo is offline
Technical Director
AKA: Gus Michel II
FRC #3946 (Tiger Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 3,575
GeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Bumper Handles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cothron Theiss View Post
I also love the idea. This would make loading and unloading the robot safer and easier. However, if your handles are mounted to the bumper, are your bumpers mounted to your frame securely enough to lift the robot? A good, secure bumper mount might not be load-bearing enough for this application.
I'd argue the other way. If I wouldn't want to lift a robot by the bumpers, they're not secure enough for FIRST Stronghold.

Edit: That said, I concur that they do not comply with the bumper rules. The rules constructively specify that bumpers are for protection, secure attachment to the chassis, and alliance color and team number designation. Any part of the bumper that does not provide one or more of these functions should not be part of the bumper. If the same parts which fill these functions just happen to provide additional functions, that's OK, but it's hard to see how lift handles fill any of the required bumper functions.
__________________

If you can't find time to do it right, how are you going to find time to do it over?
If you don't pass it on, it never happened.
Robots are great, but inspiration is the reason we're here.
Friends don't let friends use master links.

Last edited by GeeTwo : 06-03-2016 at 23:37.
Reply With Quote