Quote:
Originally Posted by Boltman
In quals its better for your team to take care of business than overly scout
you win by outscoring and earning a breaching point (maybe scaling)... so scouting during quals has little effect on outcomes IMO in this game as everyone will be playing for max scores...sure its good to know what defenses teams cannot cross but that's about it apart from expecting a defensive bot. Throw out all other stats and take notes on team tendencies (weaknesses/strengths) and how fast they score. (cycle times)
Take my advice to simplify your scouting .... figure out what your team does most efficiently by watching them by match 4..then that's your "thing" then find (20-24) other bots to compliment what you do and add what you cannot do. Also look for re-purposed defenders and if you cheesecake bots those that can be ...also Reliability and consistency are huge this year, that is what wins regional.
So as you are scouting in qualifications.... look for bots that do what you "don't do best and most efficiently/reliably " and build a list 20-24 deep. In 2015 we started this approach..we just took down alliance #1 as alliance #8 in two games (That never happens). It works. Only reason we did not win was our mechanical issues with boulder getting stuck in SF. Won't happen in CV we have a solution.
If you can customize your alliance buy finding two other perfectly matched bots your chances go way up to go to St Louis.
I only use stats to verify I did not miss any...I only found four that I reevaluated the next day.... 1/2 of the field will not be playing in eliminations so over scouting half the bots is noise you don't need..eyes on bots is the way to go. It works.
I had our alliance..we had a real good strong one as alliance #8. Had not been for mechanical issues I am certain we would have been in Finals as #8 because we had a great alliance and a good plan.
Now that my team scouted SD ..we can simplify for CV we now know what to find (and we know ourselves).
Remember numbers do not show how a team really plays nor how consistent they are or reliable...its a fatal flaw to numbers scouting in a game year like this.
|
Thank you for your advice, it really gave me another perspective on Scouting.
If I am understanding your post correctly, it's that scouting the numbers isn't as important noticing and recording each team's weaknesses and strengths? In my opinion, recording each team's strengths and weaknesses are important, but also getting down the numbers are equally important.
Many teams have two types of Scouting: Pit Scouting and Match Scouting. Both can have a major impact on seeking out teams that fit your style.
Pit Scouting is finding the capabilities of each robot. Going around to each team's pit, observing the robot, and asking their drive team some questions is where you can find the weaknesses/strengths of each robot. Yes, I've seen some instances where pit scouting isn't always effective, but that is where Match Scouting can verify the results, as you briefly stated in your reply.
Match Scouting is the numbers work of it - getting the data from what a scouter sees on the field. Seeing it firsthand, as well as recording it, can really help in solidifying the information given in Pit Scouting. This sorts the true from the false.
Thank you for advice, and our team will be considering your style of scouting this year. I guess everyone has their different style of doing things, especially scouting, and it's this difference in style that keeps things interesting
I digressed. OP, the best option IMO would probably look at the different scouting apps available. You don't have to necessarily use them, but looking at their templates for inputting data can give you a basis to make your own excel sheet. Once you have a basis, customize it as you wish.