|
Re: Reality of low-bar shooters
Quote:
Originally Posted by mentos54
Does this mean a lot of low-bar bots failed to achieve what they attempted? And if so, do you think this will be changed as the season progresses?
|
I don't think teams necessarily "failed" in what they attempted. I don't think we failed even though we never captured once in our 16 matches. For us to capture we required help. We could not guarantee a capture on our own since we needed a couple goals by our alliance partners, and to have everyone parked on the batter. We could however be pretty sure we could breach since there were more partners that could help us, so that's what we focused on.
We scored 6 high goals in teleop in our last finals match (the short blue bot). Just because the data counts us as 0% for capturing doesn't mean we're not capable. I have a feeling capture percentage will rise as the weeks go on  By champs it should be pretty common.
__________________
2016 (mentor/drive-coach)
Quarter-Finalist-Einstein, Winner-Carson Division Champs, Winner-10K Lakes, Chairman's Award-10K Lakes, Finalists-Lake Superior,
Winner-MSHSL Robotics Competition
2015 (mentor/drive-coach)
Finalists-10K Lakes, Finalists-Lake Superior, Finalist-MSHL Robotics Competition, Quarter-Finalist-Galileo Division Champs
2014 (mentor/drive-coach)
Winner-10K Lakes, Winner-Lake Superior Winner-MSHSL Robotics Competition, Quarter-Finalist-Galileo Division Champs
2013 (mentor/drive-coach)
Winner-10K Lakes, Winner-Lake Superior, Winner-MSHSL Robotics Competition, Quarter-Finalist-Newton Division Champs
2012 (mentor/drive-coach)
Finalists-Lake Superior, Semi-Finalist-MSHSL State Championship, Semi-Finalists at 10,000 Lakes
2008-2011 (college mentor)
2007 (driver)
Quarter Finalist-Milwaukee
|