|
Re: Scouting: Quantitative vs. Qualitative Poll
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oblarg
The problem with quantitative scouting is that it's prone to suffering from "garbage in, garbage out" while simultaneously looking trustworthy and reliable.
We humans have a tendency to give undue weight to numerical values simply because they are numerical values, without really putting much thought into where they came from and how meaningful they actually are. In my experience, I've found that, at least in FRC, qualitative impressions of a robot are quite a bit better than attempts to quantify performance.
Granted, there are some useful numerical scouting tools. OPR works reasonably well for offense in many games, for example. However, there's simply so much information that is clear to an astute observer that can't be easily quantified, and throwing it out simply because you can't quantify it is unwise.
|
..and from a statistical perspective not enough sample size either.
__________________
Iron Kodiaks Team #5137 San Marcos, CA
2016 Semi-Finalist | Central Valley Alliance Captain #2
2016 Semi-Finalist | San Diego 2nd bot alliance #8
2015 Semi-Finalist | Ventura 3rd bot alliance #3
2015 Quarter-Finalist| San Diego 2nd bot alliance #5
2014 Rookie All-Star | #21 San Diego | Galileo Division #91
|