View Single Post
  #125   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-03-2016, 01:36
Donut Donut is offline
The Arizona Mentor
AKA: Andrew
FRC #2662 (RoboKrew)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Goodyear, AZ
Posts: 1,289
Donut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Video Review Needs to Happen Now

Quote:
Originally Posted by alicen View Post
I'd be curious to see how many people who have volunteered as refs AND also previously been on a drive team would choose to solve this problem that everyone has. I say that because they have the perspective of having calls missed, and being in the position of seeing how it's possible that they can miss a call.
I'll bite. I was a student Coach and Driver for 3 years, mentor Coach for 2, and have reffed the last 2 years (I'll be a Coach at AZ West later this year also). As alicen and EricH noted I'm sure there are a growing number of alumni who have been on both sides.

Despite the missed calls that have happened FIRST actually has made some strides to improve referee calls. The refs do not have to watch Boulder scores at all this year (automated scoring is the best way to not miss scores even if past failures like 2006 make us wary of it) and the training has very detailed questions on difficult scenarios that could happen in match. There was also a referee update after week 1 to put more focus on Outer Works Crossings.

I think video review could help with getting calls correct, but it needs to be used in limited cases to keep events running smooth and to limit its use to fixing errors that are significant and can be reasonably evaluated. Building off of other suggestions in this thread I would propose:
  • Each Alliance is allowed one challenge/review in the playoffs. Unlimited challenges will result in reviewing every somewhat close match since no one wants their event/season to end. If the system works it could be expanded to each team having one challenge for all qualification matches also but not more to limit review quantities.
  • Head Ref leads the review process and delivers the final call, with other refs who were involved in that call assisting if necessary. The rest of the refs keep the next match getting setup correctly so that minimal time is added to normal field reset. Adding a review process should not require an increase in referee headcount given the difficulty in finding referee volunteers already.
  • Only match scoring errors (and penalties that lead to an automatic score) can be reviewed. This year that would mean defense crossings, challenges, scales, autonomous points, G13, G28, and boulders (though I am not sure if allowing review of an automatically scored element is reasonable to review, counting balls/disks scored in a match from a video is time consuming and more prone to error). Fouls are not reviewable as it is not easy to determine what fouls were assessed from a video and many involve a judgement call by a referee who has a better view than a camera or driver in their station will.
  • The score or lack of being reviewed must be significant enough to affect the outcome of the match (or an RP being awarded for games like this year). Reviewing whether a crossing was awarded in autonomous or teleop in a 40 point blowout is a waste of time and the implications on ranking tiebreakers are not significant enough to justify the resources for that.
  • Video evidence must be indisputable to change a call. The point is to receive credit for an obviously missed score, not debate further a close call that a referee already used their best judgement on (such as barely breaking contact with the Outer Works and Sally Port door).

I'm not sure that anything other than a full field view all match should be allowed, as it would be difficult to determine anything from a video flying all over the field following one robot. I don't have good suggestions on implementing a video system.

Overall I think that a review system would only be helpful in a small handful of circumstances, such as a missed stack last year or an obvious defense crossing this year. A video is not going to give a good view of things like bumpers being barely in or out of the Outer Works for when a crossing was not awarded as complete, and those are the more common scenarios that as a driver I would think "we should have scored for that" but as a referee I call a no score because of a different view on field.

Also I thought I'd throw in that I love Stronghold, the referee jobs are hard this year but this is one of the best games (especially for spectators) I've seen in FRC.
__________________
FRC Team 498 (Peoria, AZ), Student: 2004 - 2007
FRC Team 498 (Peoria, AZ), Mentor: 2008 - 2011
FRC Team 167 (Iowa City, IA), Mentor: 2012 - 2014
FRC Team 2662 (Tolleson, AZ), Mentor: 2014 - Present
Reply With Quote