View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-03-2016, 11:50
TheNerdJedi's Avatar
TheNerdJedi TheNerdJedi is offline
Drive Coach | College Student
AKA: Shajed Ahmed
FRC #0334 (Techknights)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 15
TheNerdJedi is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alpha Beta View Post
Why do so many top teams end up going low?

1. Powerhouses weren't going to blame the lack of a breach on a random alliance partners getting irrevocably stuck on a defense. They assumed it would happen and wanted to make sure they could still do the other 4. (By themselves if necessary.)
2. Class C defenses are a time suck. In eliminations top alliances are still skipping them, making low bar a faster option if capable.
3. Some of them dreamed of 2 ball autonomous modes. Low bar gave a consistent option for them to design around.
4. They remember what aggressive defense felt like in 2014 and keeping the center of gravity low to avoid being flipped correlated well with the low goal.
5. Parabolic shot trajectories from short robots can still be unblockable from the outerworks given the height restrictions of the defenses.

Alpha Beta is right, with the ability to do "everything" teams do not have to rely on their team mates to make sure they rank high.

But one thing that bugged me in the matches was the fact that low bots were often the ones that got run over by other bots in matches. Teams should take care into consideration of making sure that their robot is robustly built. I've seen robots that have gotten disabled in math due to another robot running them over.
Reply With Quote